Plé úsáideora:Guliolopez/Cartlann 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Ón Vicipéid, an chiclipéid shaor.
Is cartlann é seo. Ná hathraigh ábhar an leathanaigh seo. Más maith leat plé nua a thosú nó seanphlé a atosú, déan a leithéid ar an leathanach plé reatha. Cartlann
Cartlann 3



Ard-aighne

Buíochas, a Ghulio, as ucht na dátaí a aistriú go Gaeilge ar an lch seo. Rinne mé glan dearmad iad a aistriú. Le gach dea-ghuí, Nmacu 09:00, 3 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Níl a bhuíochas ort. Bhí "bash script" scríofa agam cúpla mí ó shin chun dátaí a aistriú go Gaeilge, agus chuir mé an alt sin faoi "próiseáil comhad" chun na dátaí a aistriú. Ní raibh sé chomh deacair agus a bheadh sé. Guliolopez 10:12, 3 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Mac an Phríora

A Ghulio, Maidir leis an lch seo, meastú an é an rud ceart le déanamh ná é a bhogadh go dtí spás úsáideora an údair? Nmacu 09:36, 4 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sea. Is maith liom an smaoineamh sin. Comhréiteach cóir atá ann. GRMA Guliolopez 10:12, 4 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bosca Sonraí Sléibhe

Tá fáilte romhat :) MacTire01 14:18, 11 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go raibh míle maith agat!

Éóg1916 08:03, 12 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maith agat ...

... arís, a chara ;) - Alison ❤ 00:18, 26 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Red Links

Sorry, when I saw the red I thought it was supposed to be removed. --Manuevertonliverpool 17:48, 27 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Understood. Please try and avoid making assumptions however about the "ins and outs" of the project, and read the intro help text for a bit. Guliolopez 21:10, 27 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, should I create more articles now?--Manuevertonliverpool 18:10, 27 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please hang on a while. Let me read through some of your changes and additions, and I may have some more suggestions for you before you start up again. Thanks. Guliolopez 21:10, 27 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to a message I received (not from you) peileadóir sacair does not make sense.He says it should be imréoir sacair.Is he right or will I just keep doing the same?--Manuevertonliverpool 17:11, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Going forward I would recommend you take the advice. Per Nmacu, "imreoir sacair" has less intrinsic redundancy. So, for any new articles use: "Is imreoir sacair é XXXXX". Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 17:19, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh - rud eile duit freisin - Aontaím nach bhfuil go leor Gaeilge agat, ach, agus rudaí á scríofa agat sna leathanaigh plé/srl, bhain triail as cúpla focal Gaeilge anois is arís. (It'll be good practice if you use a few words in the talk pages.) Beir bua. Guliolopez 17:19, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]


And what happened Teimpléád:Stumpa-peileadóirsacair? What will i replace that with?Go raibh maith agat a chara.--Manuevertonliverpool 19:04, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing. Keep using it. It's just a stub. It doesn't really matter what it's called. Use it away. (And certainly don't remove it from existing pages please). Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 19:19, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay.I thought when I opened it nothing was there.But it's okay now.--Manuevertonliverpool 19:21, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Teimpléad Stumpa-peileadóirsacair

A Ghulio, a chara, Tá nasc don chatagóir "Imreoirí sacair" istigh sa teimpléad seo rud a chiallaíonn go mbeidh aon leathanach leis an teimpléad seo air sa chatagóir seo. Ach, nuair a bhaintear an teimpléad - nuair nach síol/stumpa níos mó é - bainfear amach ón teimpléad é, nach ea? Mar sin, nár fearr go mbeadh [[Catagóir:Imreoirí sacair]] ar an leathanach féin seachas i dteimpléad atá ina Síol. Is dóigh dá mbeadh teimpléad buan againn d'imreoirí sacair, go mbeadh sé OK an fógra don Chatagóir a bheith ansin. Céard a cheapann tú? Buíochas, Nmacu 20:05, 28 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haigh Nmacu. Tá an cheart agat ar ndóigh - bheadh sé níos fearr na leathanaigh a chur díreach isteach san Catagóir (seachas an teimpléad a úsáid chun é sin a dhéanamh). Ar ndóigh áfach, tá timpeall 200 Stumpaí-peileadóirí ann. Agus níl ach líne amháin inti de gnáth. Bhí orm iad a glanadh go tapa agus roinnt "wikification" a dhéanamh orthu go léir. Bhain mé úsáid as roinnt "shorthand" chun iad a rangú dá bhárr. Nuair a bhfuil modh agat chun iad a ath-rangú agus an teimpléad a bhaint amach, bheinn an sásta an athrú sin a dhéanamh.
----
Hi Nmacu. You're right of course. All things being equal, those pages should be put in the cat directly. Not by virtue of the template. Unfortunately however there are 200 footballer stubs. Most of which barely have 1 line, and their creators invariably havn't invested the time to wikify them properly. I added the cat into the template as a "shorthand" means of categorising all 200+ of them quickly. If you can think of a quick way of re-categorising them after we take out the template, I'd support removing the auto-cat from the template.
Guliolopez 10:55, 29 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ní dóigh liom gur rud mór é an Cat a fhágáil sa teimpléad - níl mórán de na leathanaigh seo chun fás mórán níos mó. Is é an fáth a chur mé an cheist ná go bhfuilim fós ag foghlaim faoin bealach is fearr le plé le teimpléid, srl. agus bhí mé cineál "ag smaoineamh os ard" nuair a sheol mé an teachtaireacht thuas chugat - tuigim go bhfuil i bhfad níos mó taithí agat lena leithéid. B'fhéidir go gcaithfidh mé roinnt a léamh faoi conas "bot" a chruthú a d'fhéadfadh cuid den obair leadránach (ar nós Catagóirí a chur isteach go huathoibríoch) a dhéanamh. Ach ní inniu ná amárach a bheidh an t-am agam é sin a dhéanamh, faraor! Ádh mór, Nmacu 11:29, 29 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Duffy

Faith then "Mercy" was top of the charts at the start of March boyín--Kelleherjoe 18:50, 1 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Tá an cheart agat. D'fhéach mé ar IRMA.ie inné, agus chonaic mé go raibh "Mercy" ag uimhir a naoi. IrishCharts.ie confirms that it did hit a high of #1. Gabh mo leithscéal. Guliolopez 18:58, 1 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Rang i measc na Vicipéidí

Go raibh maith agat, a Ghulio. Ní dhearna mé é mar ní féidir liom an ich a athrú, toisc go bhfuil sí faoi ghlas. Tameamseo 14:40, 15 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh. An bhfuil an leathanach seo faoi ghlas? Ní raibh fhois agam. Gabh mo leithscéal... Guliolopez 14:46, 15 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help please

Hi could you help me translate the Dustin the Turkey article, and the Charlotte Perrelli article into beautiful irish. thanks.--217.209.116.113 15:15, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is already a Dustin Turcaí article. I will look at the Charlotte Perrelli shortly. Next time, it would be preferred if you could create these articles on the sandbox, or as a subset of your user page. (We'd rather not have "non-irish" content in the main space.) Thanks. Guliolopez 15:23, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ag athdhíriú go

Go raibh maith agat as do theachtaireacht. Ceart go leor, stopfaidh mé! Chonaic mé naisc mar Bertie Ahern agus cheap mé go mba mhaith an rud é an rud céanna a dhéanamh i gcásanna mar Brian Cody, agus go mbeadh muid in ann rudaí mar a tharla i gcás Dustin the Turkey a sheachaint mar sin. Ach ní leanfaidh mé ar aghaidh leis. Tameamseo 15:57, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GRMA. Guliolopez 16:00, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Athraithe

Ní athraithe go leor a bhí go dona ach na cinn deireanacha. Go raibh maith agat faoi do chuir eile in eagar. Peadar 12:49, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gabh mo leithscéal as mo chuid "botún" lena háit breithe. Ach bhí mé ag iarraidh cúpla fheabhsuithe a chur in éagar - leis an "intro", agus leis an abairt sin freisin: "Rugadh mac di nuair a bhásaigh sí sa bhliain 1506".
The intro needed clean-up because the first sentence had no verb. You've corrected that since. The intro could still do with an additional tidy for readability however. For example, instead of being in brackets, her place of death for example may be better split into a sentence. ("She died in year Y, at place X, now called Z").
The second change I was trying to introduce was to the manner of her death. The current sentence reads: "A son was born to her when she died in 1506". The causal factor of her death (complications during child birth) is a little unclear here. It would be better phrased: "She died during the birth of her son in 1506." IE: "X happened when Y", rather than the current "Y happened when X" structure. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 13:48, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Articles And Irish

My Irish is not brilliant, so i was wondering,should I add anything to articles if it is slightly wrong? Maybe if I put what I wanted to do in the plé area and somebody could translate them? Many things would not be stubs then.--86.45.132.73 17:21, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The offer is very much appreciated, but - to be honest - that wouldn't be of massive value. What you might consider doing instead is improving existing articles in other ways - ways in which your Irish skills wouldn't be as problematic. Examples would include: applying the norms of the Manual of Style, ensuring articles are categorised correctly, maybe adding/updating an infobox or two. I notice you have editted some soccer player bios. If you are interested, I could create an "infobox" to be used on player bio pages (something equivalent to this one from the EN project), and possibly with some help and examples, you could start adding it to the articles in the Catagóir:Imreoirí sacair category. If I created the infobox, would you be willing to add it to the articles? Guliolopez 17:42, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then!I had just finished the S.S. Lazio article so tht is out but I would like to try the infobox thing. I based the Lazio one on the A.C. Milan and Arsenal articles.--86.45.132.73 17:52, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Good. First thing you should do so is create an account. It doesn't cost anything, and you don't have to provide any personal information. Just a user name. That's it. Once you've got that created, let me know and I'll build a little test space under your profile where you can play with the template - and once you know what you're doing you can go nuts on all the player bio pages. Guliolopez 18:20, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I've create a new template called "Teimpléad:Imreoir sacair bosca eolais". Have a look at the sample on the template page, or at the John Terry or Roy Keane articles for examples on how to use it. Please take care when loading it, and be sure to make use of the "preview" button to be sure of your changes before committing them. Ar aghaidh leat. Guliolopez 20:49, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is my new account!--Crokepark 17:04, 29 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added the infobox on Rio Ferdinand, but, I won't edit any other articles unless the Rio edit is correct.--Crokepark 18:05, 29 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Crokepark. Great job to start with! Maith an fear! A couple of quick things however:
  1. Convention is to put Infoboxes at the start of articles. So, please have a look at moving the template bit ({{Template|FOO}}) BEFORE the sentence that starts: "Is imreoir blah blah". IE: To the very TOP of the article.
  2. Some of Ferdinand's previous clubs should probably be added. (WestHam 95-2000, Leeds 2000-02, etc). Have a look at the Andy Reid article for a sample. Click on the "athraigh an lch seo" link to see the template format. See how his previous club history is laid out? With all the years in the "blianta" section? And all the club names in the "clubanna" section? Try and list Ferdinand's club history in the same way. Use the en:Rio Ferdinand article on the English wikipedia as a source for the club names and dates. Use the preview ("Taispeáin réamhamharc") button to test your changes before submitting them.
Let me know if you get stuck. Otherwise that's good stuff. Beir bua leis! Guliolopez 00:03, 30 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cad a cheapann tú?

Haigh a Ghulio! B'fhéidir nach bhfuil fhios agat ach faoi láthair táim ag obair ar Vicipéid Gaeilge Mhanann. Tá mé i mo riarthóir sealadach ar an tionscadal le dhá mhí anuas. Chonaic mé inniú go raibh a lán úsáideoir nua cruthaithe uathoibrithe. Dá mbéadh seans agat, an féidir leat do shúile a caitheamh ar an leathanach seo le do thoil? Táim ag lorg comhairle faoi. Is féidir leat freagra a thabhairt domsa anseo nó anseo más fearr leat. GRMA --MacTire01 18:03, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Feicim go bhfuil siad anseo fosta! Hmm! --MacTire01 18:05, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sea. Feicim an rud chéanna le cúpla lá anuas. Ceapaim gur sort "upgrade" atá i gceist. Is dócha go bhfuil an freagra iomlán/ceart ag Alison no Gabriel (ós rud go bhfuil siad níos gnóthach ar an commons srl), ach ceapaim féin go bhfuil an eachtra seo ar súil: There tends to be a lot of "impersonation" between wikis, and also there is the potential for a simple "duplication" of user names between wikis (quite innocently, one user could call himself "John316" here, where there is already a "John316" on the GV project, and confusion ensues.) So, I think what has been implemented is a method for users to have "stub accounts" created for them on all wikis. As a means of "blocking" dupe or impersonator account creation. I dunno where it is, but - chances are - you can get your name added to a centralised list someplace, and a bot/script will "auto create" your user name on all other wikis. As a way of blocking it for you. That's what I think is happening anyway. Beir bua leis do chuid obair anseo agus ar an GV wiki. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 18:16, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tuigim anois. GRMA a Ghulio! Cuirfidh mé an cheist roimh Alison. --MacTire01 18:45, 27 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Delio Rossi

I can't use very much to put in for Delio Rossi. —Scríobh an t-úsáideoir Crokepark (plé • dréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

I found plenty :) Guliolopez 23:33, 1 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)[reply]


DOB

Thanks for the tip.--Lansdowneroad 20:03, 23 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. As you noted yourself (in your change to the Michael McGovern article) it may take a while for someone to come back around and make updates. So its best not to unnecessarily include stuff that will need updating regularly. Cheers. (Oh. And PS. If Ferdinand was born in November '78, that would make him 29. Not thirty.) Guliolopez 22:50, 23 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. And another tip. If a footballer went on to become a manager, can you consider putting them in the manager cat as well? Just add: [[Catagóir:Bainisteoirí sacair|LASTNAME, FIRSTNAME]] below where you have the template. See Roy Keane for example. Go n-éirí leis an obair agus go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 22:56, 23 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added the bainisteoirí sacair catagóir to David Moyes and I have removed some of the pages with DOBs. In the future I will leave them out.--Lansdowneroad 13:21, 26 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Paul Ince

On the Paul Ince article, chuir tú an glanadh template on the top of the leathanach, and I would like to know how I can clean it up.--Lansdowneroad 12:28, 9 Iúil 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Íomhá:Firefoxga.png‎

Usually "Content (c) WMF - portions (c) the Mozilla Org (whatever they're name is now)" - fair use / screenshot license. Big thing is that it's Fair Use and that Wikimedia logos are copyright. That's kinda how it's done on enwiki - Alison ❤ 01:01, 16 Iúil 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go raibh maith agat. I'll have a look at the best way to represent this "mixed" copyright status (given that we don't have the full "multi license" templates at the moment) and update it soon. Le meas. Guliolopez 09:34, 16 Iúil 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cordata

Bhí mé ag smaoineamh ar seo le déanaí! Caithfidh mé a rá go bhfuil ciall leis an iolra toisc go bhfuil an leagan sa Laidin san iolra. Feicim go bhfuil an iolra in úsáid i dteangacha eile..níl lucht an Bhearla ina measc áfach. An féidir na leaganacha atá san uimhir uatha a thiontú go dtí an uimhir iolra anois gan mórán dua? Maith dhomh 'Ó Bama'...bhí mé ag magadh! Tá íontas an Domhain orm roimh an méid ama a chaitheann tú i mbun eagarthoireachta na Vicipéide agus tá mé faoi chomaoin agat toisc an méid a rinne tú domh. Adh mór ort, Éamonn Éóg1916 17:33, 18 Iúil 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haigh a hEamonn.
  • RE: "Cordaigh v Cordach, srl". Aontaím leat go bheadh sé níos fearr roinnt "comhsheasmhacht" a bheith againn anseo - agus is dócha go mbeadh sé níos fearr an struchtúr Laidineach a leanúnt. (IE: An iolra a úsáid i ngach áit). I'll have a look and see how much effort would be involved to move all the articles which have the singular in the title to a plural equivalent. (I think there's quite a few however, and it may be a lot of work. I'll check though).
  • RE: "Barac Ó Bama". Ní raibh sé léir dom go bhfuil "bob" inti. Tá an athsheoladh (Barac Ó Bama) fós ann, so some of the joke survived my revert :)
  • RE: "M'obair féin". Go raibh maith agat - is dócha go bhfuil mé ag caitheamh an iomarca ama anseo, ach táim sásta leis an "aitheantas".
Guliolopez 00:00, 20 Iúil 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hey Gulio having problems putting in pictures. Liam Kearney, Colin Healy and Denis Behan all have pictures in English Wikipedia but I am somehow unable to upload these for some unknown reason. I have succeeded in uploading images before. (Alan Curbishley and David Moyes for example.)--Lansdowneroad 19:48, 5 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Fan noiméad - níl na íomhanna sin ar an Cómhaoin fós. Beidh siad suas i gceann tamaillín. Déan iarracht arís más maith leat :) - Alison ❤ 06:15, 6 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Y Déanta go léir anois, ach níl aon íomhá faoi Liam Kearney ar an vicipéid Béarla :/ - Alison ❤ 06:38, 6 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me Irish

My Irish is not the best and you added a type of glanadh tag to Dave Mooney. Whatever it is, me irish ain't able to know what it says.--Lansdowneroad 12:23, 11 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This was a new template that was proposed here. What that template says simply is "This page needs some review for language/grammar. Please don't take out this template until a native speaker has reviewed".
Please don't take it as a negative comment on your submission that I've attached the template to that article - you're doing some good work here. It's just that that particular article might need a little review by a native speaker. Which probably isn't me. Guliolopez 12:32, 11 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, I added it without knowing if it was right.--Lansdowneroad 12:36, 11 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa Chontae an Dúin

B'fhearr liom 'an Dún' i ndath dearg agus an chuid eile den tír i ndath glas! Ní thuigim cén fáth go bhfuil gá le 5 as na 6 chontae a bheith i ndath eile. Éóg1916 10:09, 19 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Níor chruthaigh mé féin na híomhánna seo - nílim ach a bhaint úsáid astu. Féach ar na léarscáil atá ag an commons: commons:Category:Maps of Northern Ireland. There is another set on commons that uses green. See: commons:Image:CountyTyrone.png. An bhéadh na cinn seo níos fearr? Guliolopez 10:30, 19 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caisleán Bhaile Átha Cliath

My name(Hohen_ga) does not appear for the edits I made to this article, only an IP number--why is this?Hohen ga 01:57, 24 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mustn't have been signed in properly I suppose. Guliolopez 09:30, 25 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{Infobox Coinbhleacht Mhíleata

A Ghulio, a chara, Nach bhfuil tú chun seo a chur i gceart domh? Éóg1916 12:46, 2 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Níl go leor am agam anois. Féachfaidh mé amárach nó anocht... Guliolopez 12:52, 2 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tá go maith!Éóg1916 19:19, 2 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Críochnaithe. Teimpléad:Infobox_Coinbhleacht_Mhíleata. Guliolopez 10:45, 3 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Táim fíor bhuíoch díot.

Éóg1916 17:57, 3 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook as gaeilge

N'fheadar an bhfuil a fhois ag mórán daoi9ne anseo faoi iarrachtaí facebook a chuir as gaeilge? Pé scéal é bhí mé ag dul tríd na focail le iad a istriú agus bhí chuid de na daoine i bhfábhar "Cuardach" a úsáid le haghaidh "search", cén fáth go bhfuil cuardaigh in úsáid againn anseo agus "Cuardach" in úsáid mar shampla ag google? más mian leat freisin (má tá an am agat agus má tá cuntas agat) féach; http://www.facebook.com/translations/

is mise le meas

--Spaircí 16:21, 11 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "Cuardach" v "Cuardaigh" Dar liomsa, tá Google san éagóir. Ainmfhocal atá i gceist le "Cuardach". ("A search" not "To search") Féach ar na tionscadail Éireannach: focail.ie, beo.ie, srl. Bhaintear úsáid as an bhriathar; "Cuardaigh". (In short, I think Google are in the wrong. Cuardach is the noun form. "A search" not "To search". Compare having a button that said "exploration" rather than "explore". All the real Irish projects use the proper verbal form. So, if you're working on the facebook button, don't copy Google.)
RE: Facebook as Gaeilge Bhainfidh mé triail as. GRMA
Guliolopez 16:46, 11 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I just had a look at the Facebook "voting" system for translations. And I'm going to temper what I just said. The context for the word "Search" in Facebook appears to be the noun form. So maybe "Cuardach" is OK. EG: "Friend search" is an example given. And this is the noun form. (IE: "A search for Friends") So "Cuardach" is probably OK here. If it said "Search for friends" however that'd be a different story. It also made me realise that Google's use is probably OK as well. Given that the button says "Cuardach Google". Which I can only assume is intended to be the noun form as well. As a translation of "Google search" or "A search of Google". (FYI - I'm not really a big "facebook-er", so probably won't get that involved with the translations. Beir bua leis áfach.) Guliolopez 17:00, 11 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • grma as ocht sin. sin mar a cheap mé, ach cheap mé go raibh sé aisteach ní bhfuair "cuardaigh" aon vótaí....ach ar aon nós leanfaidh mé leis.

grma arís --Spaircí 19:06, 11 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guliolopez

Hi Guliolopez! Ho are you? Could you please help with creating a short (1-3 sentence) stub in Gaeilge of this article in the English language Wiki? Thanks so much for any help on this, truly yours, Giovanna 16:15, 28 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Guliolopez. Please excuse my ignorance, but would this stub from another Wiki be of any help for what I talked about in the earlier message?
'S e buidheann poileataigeach a tha ann am Partido Independentista Puertorriqueño (Spàinntis), neo ainm goirid: PIP, ('s Bheurla: Puerto Rican Independence Party). Tha iad ag iarraidh neo-eisimeileachd Puerto Rico. Chaidh am pàrtaidh a stèidheachadh anns a' bhliadhna 1946. 'S e aon de trì buidheannan poileataigeach a tha anns an dùthaich seo.
Thanks for letting me know, yours, Giovanna 17:15, 28 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]


infobox míleate srl

grma as an ghlanadh sin, rinne mé meascán den info box ón alt Cogadh Cathartha na Fionlainne, agus an cheann as Béarla, ach ar ndóigh bhí sé deacair go leoir, pé scéal é tá na hailt faoin Spáinn agus stair na Spáinne ag fás agus ag fhobairt, ach níl ach mion eolais ar alt na tíre ([[An Spáinn])..... Léanfaimid ar aigeadh ar ndóigh ;) --Spaircí 14:18, 16 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do Theachtaireacht

A Ghulio, a chara, Tá brón orm ach nílim ach tar éis do theachtaireacht a fháil anois! Tá brú mór orm san obair faoi láthair agus bíonn sé an-deacair am a fháil le caitheamh leis an Vicipéid. Feicim go bhfuil neart de na teachtaireachtaí aistrithe faoin am seo ach go bhfuil roinnt cinn nach bhfuil fós. Bainfidh mé triail as roinnt acu a dhéanamh ar maidin. Le dea-ghuí,

Nmacu 11:19, 19 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thosaigh mé ar cúpla ceann a aistriú agus chonaic mé an phéire seo:
  • 121. Cnaipe Beaga
  • 122. Cnaipe Móra
Níl siad seo ceart ach gan an Béarla nílim cinnte an é "Cnaipí Beaga" nó "Cnaipe Beag" a bhí i gceist. Mar an gcéanna i gcás "Cnaipí :Móra" nó "Cnaipe Mór".
Nmacu 11:30, 19 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GRMA. Rinne mé dearmad ar an obair seo. Féachfaidh mé ar arís díreach. Guliolopez 14:40, 19 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Féar plé duit as ucht é a dhéanamh beo. Céard go díreach a rinne tú leis sin a bhaint amach? Mar shampla, má tá cúpla botún le ceartú, an leor an téacs ar Meta a cheartú nó an gcaithfear é sin a dhéanamh agus an sin céim foilsithe éigin eile a thógáil freisin? Sílim go bhfuil cúpla rud fós a d'fhéadfaí a fheabhsú sa téacs. Mar shampla, ba cheart dúinn focal cinnte a roghnú i gcomhair "donation". Feicim go bhfuil "tabhartas" molta ag focal.ie ach sílim go bhfuil "síntiús" níos mó in úsáid (cé go bhfuil sé thíos mar "subscription" seachas "donation"). Rud eile ná "Ag éascú an saol" ba cheart go mbeadh saol sa ghinideach anseo "Ag éascú an tsaoil" ach b'fhéidir go bhfuil nach cainte níos deise fós. Beidh mé in ann na rudaí seo a fhiosrú le comhghleacaithe atá níos eolaí ná mé féin faoi seo. Nmacu 13:09, 20 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bhuel. Bhí Gabriel níos tapúla fós. Chríochnaigh sé (agus d'fhoilsigh sé) na haistriú aréir. (Nílim cinnte féin conas a foilsíodh iad - seachas go bhfuil an "banner ad" agus an "donate now page" suas ar líne anois. Muna bhfuil aistriúcháin eile le dhéanamh áfach (nó botúin), nílim cinnte conas iad a dhéanfaí). Is dócha go bhfuil fhois ag Gabriel...(?) Guliolopez 16:11, 20 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tá :-) Déan ceartúcháin ar an leathanach meta:Fundraising 2008/core messages/ga, agus ansin ba féidir iarratas a chur isteach go rannóg aistriúcháin Wikimedia chun an leagan "bheo" a nuashonrú. Ní mór duit ach logáil isteach ar irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-translation (nó irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia, má tá an seomra sin folamh) agus é a iarradh ar cheann de na saorálaigh. Tá teachtaireachtaí eile le haistriú fós (meta:Fundraising 2008/supplementary pages) dar ndóigh. --Gabriel Beecham 19:19, 20 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chuir mé ag éascú an tsaoil ann. An féidir le héinne iarratas a chur isteach go rannóg aistriúcháin Wikimedia chun an leagan "bheo" a nuashonrú. Ní mór duit ach logáil isteach ar irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-translation (nó irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia, má tá an seomra sin folamh) agus é a iarradh ar cheann de na saorálaigh, mar a deir Gabhriel? Tameamseo 22:44, 16 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Ré: J. M. W. Turner

Go raibh maith agat ós ucht na haithríthe ar an leathnach seo. Níl mórán eolas agam ar chonas leathnaigh vicipéid a scríobh. Aon uair a chuirim cúntas le chéile cealaítear é. Cad thuige sin? Tá brón orm faoi an Gaeilge lofa, níl mé ach i mo dalta sa chéad bhlian san ollscoil!—Scríobh an t-úsáideoir 78.16.40.112 (plé • dréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

Bosca Sonraí Eolaí

GRMA Éóg1916 10:57, 22 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diarmaid Mac Murchada

Sílim gur riarthóir thú - n'fheadar an chabhrófa liom le mionsonra atá ag cur as dom le tamall fada anuas. Ní mhair rí darbh ainm Diarmaid Mac Murchadha Caomhánach riamh. Diarmaid Mac Murchadha ab ainm dó. Domnall Caomhánach Mac Murchadha ab ainm dá mhac. Níl Diarmaid Mac Murchada Caomhánach ar an saol áit ar bith seachas ar an Vicipéid, agus is cúis náire é... Cathal 00:51, 26 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D'athainmnigh mé an leathanach mar Diarmaid Mac Murchadha. Tameamseo 01:25, 26 Samhain 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, please you could translate in Irish en:Lola Pagnani?

Good evening to you. Regards from Calabria! You scirivo regarding my friend's article. If out of politeness you could translate in Irish her biography. In change I will help you with my Italian. They are biographer and geographer on the editions Italian, Sicilian, Neapolitan and Spanish. In attends him of one certain answer of yours I thank you in advance! Also for part of Lola!--Lodewijk Vadacchino 14:35, 12 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Libertas External links

Hi
RE: Wikipedia:External links

What was wrong with a link to Flickr? There are no images on the article? As far as I can see Wikipedia:External links doesn't exclude links to Flickr?

Also Wikipedia:EL#cite_note-0 says "Note that under WP:External links, a link to a social networking site may be included when it is the official website for a business, organization, or person." That Facebook link was an official website for Libertas.--Trounce 19:39, 15 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Hiya. Possibly I shouldn't have been so curt in my edit summary and explained myself a little better. At the simplest level, External Links are intended to provide a supplementary encyclopedically relevant resource to the user. That can't be found in the article - or elsewhere. In most cases there is no information on the links added that can't be found on the "main" Libertas.eu site. Which is already linked. In fact, all those links are prominently displayed on the Libertas.eu site, and so they are redundant, and somewhat problematic under WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Twitter in particular is not a useful research or informational resource. It isa blogging site, and not really all that relevant. There are also potential concerns under WP:EL#ADV for promotion. Same deal with Facebook really. While I understand your point about "official SN sites are OK", we should not be using WP to promote their social networking outlets. Because that's all that link really serves to do: promote. Leave promotion up to Libertas and their own homepage. Finally, I understand the point about there being "no images" and that "Flickr is not explicitly excluded". Personally I'm unsure of the value (as it also smacks of promotion), but if you see some value in adding Flickr back in, then I won't get upset :) Guliolopez 10:17, 16 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
The point you make about most of the links being prominently displayed on the Libertas.eu site makes sense. And I am glad we agree that Flickr isn't explicitly excluded. I'm not going to restore the links. I appreciate your good attitude. Beannachtí na Nollaig duit.--Trounce 12:05, 16 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

87.42.122.7 arís ag déanamh loitiméaracht

Haigh a Ghulio,

Tá an dréachtóir 87.42.122.7 ag déanamh loitiméaracht ar ailt arís. An féidir leat cosc a chur orthu ar feadh blian nó níos faide? Le dea-ghuí, --MacTire02 12:24, 17 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

GRMA. Cheap mé ar dtús go gcuirfinn "{{cosc|bliain}}" orthu, ach chuir mé "{{cosc|6mhí}}" orthu faoi dheireadh. (Meitheamh a bheadh ann ansin - agus beidh siad ar saoire ón scoil ar aon nós) Guliolopez 14:36, 17 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Stíl Priomhleathanach nua?

Haigh, a Ghuliolopez. Bhí mé ag obair ar saghas 'Makeover' faoin Príomhleathanach. An bhfuil aon tuairimí agat faoi? I was kinda hoping to get it live for the New Year - it would be a lovely start, but don't just want to be too WP:BOLD and just slap it on up there. The current one is painfully out of date and has a lot of broken and just plain illegible stuff. Thoughts? - Alison ❤ 00:13, 23 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Feictear dom gur feabhsú mór atá ann - go n-aistrí tú é mur is mian leat... :) Guliolopez 02:40, 27 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Míle buíochas le do mhalartú! Beidh an leathanach 'beo' roimh an Áthbhliain :) Thanks!! - Alison ❤ 08:05, 27 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Y Déanta anois!! Woohoo!! ^__^ - Alison ❤ 02:58, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Chonaic mé é níos luaithe! Jab an-mhaith :) Ceist amháin: An bhfuil spás ann don dáta ar an príomhleathanach? San stíl nua? Cosúil leis an "On this day..." ar an tionscadal EN? (But simpler - possibly even just a link to the article on today's date?) Guliolopez 03:04, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Ar ndóigh - oops! Cúpla noiméid anseo .... Maith agat arís :) - Alison ❤ 03:19, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Y Déanta - Alison ❤ 10:33, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
(Béarla - brón orm, ach tá a lán 'jargon' a leanas)
Hi again. I've put a temporary link in to the page-of-the-day and it works just fine. It's just a link, as before, and not a proper transclude, as other wikis do it. I've put in a bunch of work and taken a stab at a fully-automated, transcluded version. Take a look at Úsáideoir:Alison/Príomhleathanach again and check out the "Ar an lá seo ..." section. Basically, it's all working (apart from #time needing localization) but there's a mammoth task ahead to format all the 29 Nollaig pages into Vicipéid:Laethanta cothrom roghnaithe/29 Mí na Nollag to allow them to be transcluded onto the mainpage. I strongly suspect that that "Laethanta cothrom" phrase is wonky, too. Feel free to rename it :) We'd have two pages per day; a "best of / featured" page and a more comprehensive day-of-the-month page. People can chop and change the featured page for transclusion, but the more detailed day page is more stable and has more images, etc. This is how enwiki and dewiki do things.
What do you think? Are we as a project up to doing this sort of day-on-day stuff? Do we have the where-withal to churn out 365 "On this day" pages? I'm up for putting in the work, esp. as I'm retired from Enwiki :) , and it only needs to be done once. What do you think? - Alison ❤ 10:33, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Honestly? I'm really not sure its worth it :) I think what you have (the simple link form as [[{{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}]]) is probably enough for the time being. Myself and an anon have been updating the "current date" pages everyday since the summer, and so these pages are largely being formed into something reasonable. I really couldn't face reforming them into another template format :( I really like what you've done with the template - such that it could be included in the main page - but I personally couldn't face the "drudgery" of recreating a version 366 times :P (But then I'm well known for my lazy tendencies - there may be others with more enthusiasm :) Guliolopez 19:23, 29 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
I'm mostly in agreement (hey, I'm lazy too :) ) but the lure of having dynamic, daily updates to the mainpage is kinda swaying me. Having content update on the mainpage is a major 'pull' for a wiki - any wiki - and if gawiki had an "Ar an Lá Seo ..." section that automagically looked after itself, well I think that would draw readers here. Same with an Íomhá Roghnaithe - spinning that one weekly would be well within our capabilities and would keep people coming back. All IMO, of course :D
I'll give it a month's trial, if that's okay, and will try to update a month a week. The info doesn't really go out of date - it just needs new events - and after a year's worth, it's done. We can use the section to "show off" our articles on the mainpage and we also have daily updated links to the more comprehensive "day" pages. I'll put in the donkey work and maybe as things progress, others might get drawn in ;) Same with the featured pic - there are badzillions of them on Commons and all the main wikis have a daily turnover. If we can do "Íomhá an tSeachtain", that would be a major step.
Anyways ... it's all work, but I promise to put the work in. Beats mediating disputes on enwiki any day - Alison ❤ 05:34, 30 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Dirty hacks all around tonight :) However, when all the infrastructure is in, we'll have a catalog of important dates and anniversaries like no other. There's a lot of work to all that and some of the dates and paths are not localized yet (partly due to the math around #time) but it'll get done - Alison ❤ 06:45, 30 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
You've almost convinced me :) Certainly to the extent that I'll chip in where/when I can. (Possibly as an offshoot to the "tidy up" I'm already doing day by day on the "days of the year".) I remain a tad sceptical that we'll have the time/wherewithall to "police" a full "selected events/on this day" (featured article) style model. Mainly because the current selections barely sustain a 2 month turnaround. (And so a one day turnaround seems ambitious). But then maybe I'm carrying my EN projected jaded-ness with me :p Anyway, long story short: I'm behind you on this, and will chip in where I can. Only word of advice: Maybe create a "blank" template for every single day if you can - so that, if you/me/no-one gets around to it, then at least we don't have a "red link" on the homepage. Beir bua leis! Guliolopez 23:18, 30 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

←Maith agat arís. Having a backup plan is a must, and you've given me a great idea. I can get a 'bot to run off all the daily pages - it'll take all of about two minutes - and basically put up the static text (as on the mainpage before) in each page. They can all go in a 'laethanta de dhith' category, just to make it easier for us. Thanks for your blessing on this - it'll work out great! - Alison ❤ 03:26, 2 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baile Bh{ú/u}irne

De réir an phlé ar w:Ballyvourney, fágfaidh mé Baile Bhuirne mar atá sé agus deinfidh mé teagmháil leis an gCoimisiún Logainmneacha mar gheall ar an litriú oifigiúil. Tá Baile Bhúirne in úsáid chomh maith, mar sin d'athraíos an leathanach ar en.wiki chun an litriú sin a chur san áireamh. Go raibh maith agat as do chuid chabhrach. —Leftmostcat 00:51, 31 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

Tá go maith! GRMA Guliolopez 02:10, 31 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Aisghafa ó "https://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plé_úsáideora:Guliolopez/Cartlann_3&oldid=280376"