Plé úsáideora:Varlaam

Ón Vicipéid, an chiclipéid shaor.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Haigh, a Varlaam, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.

Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 08:14, 10 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)

Redlinks[athraigh foinse]

Hi. Thanks for starting that list page. Your edit to restore the "inline interwikis" on that list page implied that the page was all-but useless without them. You are not a noob editor, so you know this already, but there is nothing wrong with redlinks:

  • For editors it would show us where there are key novels (important topics) without GA articles, and might prompt someone to create them
  • For readers they (now) can't readily see where there are GA articles, and where there are EN articles (at the moment it's very difficult for a reader to discern, and it is detracting from the project to send them to the EN wiki without being clear)

Hence I do not agree with the implication that the page is "not useful" without these inline-interwikis. Not least because if a reader wanted to "get to" the articles in another language, they could simply click the relevant interwiki for the "list page", and find them that way. (As is the norm)

Anyway, it goes against the norms and best-practices of this project (the GA Wiki) to have inline interwikis of that type. We are not about to remove every single red-link on all GA articles, and replace them with interwikis to projects where the articles already exist. That is not the purpose of the project, and it does NOT make the project any less "useful" if we don't do this. So, unless you have specific reason for having "inline interwikis" on this page alone, then I am going to remove them again. Is there some reason that this page is a "special case"? Thanks a lot again for your contribs. Guliolopez (talk) 10:21, 5 Iúil 2013 (UTC)