Plé úsáideora:Guliolopez/Cartlann 5

Ón Vicipéid, an chiclipéid shaor.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Is cartlann é seo. Ná hathraigh ábhar an leathanaigh seo. Más maith leat plé nua a thosú nó seanphlé a atosú, déan a leithéid ar an leathanach plé reatha. Cartlann
Cartlann 5



Photo requests

Is Dublin Airport convenient to your location? If so, would you mind photographing the headquarter buildings of Aer Lingus and Ryanair (each airline has one building) - Thank you WhisperToMe 16:54, 23 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm unlikely to be able to do/get to this. Guliolopez 03:17, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)
Thanks anyway :) WhisperToMe 16:59, 8 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)

Teimpléad:Bosca sonraí

Dunno what's going on there, but I do see the problem. It's likely to be something in Common.css - I'll have a dig around over the next day or so and try to fix it. We really kinda need that template - Alison 22:03, 1 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)

Cheers. Another thing that might be common.css related is why Teimpléad:Side box spans the entire page. Instead of being right aligned in the same way as its EN cousin (which has exactly the same syntax). Guliolopez 03:17, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)
OK - I think I've solved both of those. But you might want to double check (in case I mucked up something else).... Guliolopez 03:25, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)

Cúpla Ceist:

Fuair mé an teachtaireacht a sheol tú, déanfaidh mé iarracht comhrá as Gaeilge (Beatha teanga í a labhairt srl), cé nach bhfuil mé líofa.

  • Is míthuiscint an íosluchtú mí ceart, (Is dócha go bhfuil muid ag caint faoin Íomhá:Lógó_an_CLG.svg) I honestly don't know how I uploaded the wrong one, I looked at the CLG page, and it looked fine. My apologies
  • D'féach mé ar ais, agus feicim nár chur mé aon clib cóipceart ar an Íomhá seo Íomhá:Meadú ar ráta breithe 98-07.gif. Bhí sé mar meoin agam fáil amach: What permissions exist from reports etc released by the Irish Government?, Dála an scéal, rinne mé graif eile don alt, agus mar sin, is féidir é a scrois anois. But also, there is a limited number of Copyright templates, in this case (had CSO data not been available - perhaps in case of a HSE specific graph) I didn't know which Copyright template to use
  • Looking at the images on this page again Vicipéid:Íomhá_Greannmhar, none fit the fair use policy, ie there is no educational benifit, feel free to delete!

Rinne mé iarracht treoireacha do shaghas éigin a tosú ar an leathanach Vicipéid:Leathanach_tuairiscithe_íomhá, Ceapaim go bhfuil easpa treoir ann don úsáideoir nua, so, má tá am agat (nuair nach bhfuil tú ag ceartú mo chuid botún! :) ) ceapaim gur fiú na treoireacha a chur ar fáil. Cliste

Collapsible navboxes

... are slightly briste right now, for some reason. One of our Mediawiki updates seems to have destroyed the format. I tried updating some stuff but it's not right yet - Alison 05:34, 27 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)

Ya. I noticed that on an Róimh a few days ago. I had a quick look at the CSS and templates to see what might be causing it, but nothing leapt out. I had intended to come back and review again, but promptly forgot about it. Guliolopez 10:49, 27 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)


Cóipcheart

Fuair me teachtaireacht uait faoi íomhanna a chruthaigh mé. Is léir go bhfuil fadhb le cóipcheart ach ní thuigim cad is cóir dom a dhéanamh. Do chruthaigh mé iad mé féin, mar shampla ar paradacsa simpson. Is iad seo na céid íomhanna a rinne mé agus níl rialacha vicipéid ar eolas agam fós. GRMAJP2JP2 22:31, 7 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)

Ag iarraidh teideal a athrú

A chara! Táim ag iarraidh beagán ord a chur ar an iliomad ailt atá againn leis an IRA, Óglaigh na hÉireann agus araile. Sílim gur cheart dúinn alt amháin a bheith ann faoin ainm 'Óglaigh na hÉireann', le heolas ann faoi na grúpaí éagsúla a bhaineann úsáid as. É sin déanta, ba cheart gach leathanach eile a ainmniú le teideal níos cruinne - Óglaigh na hÉireann (1913-1919), Óglaigh na hÉireann (1919-1922), Óglaigh na hÉireann (1922-1969) agus araile. Ach, nuair a dhéanaim iarracht alt a dhéanamh leis an teideal Óglaigh na hÉireann, deirtear go bhfuil ceann ann cheana, mar tá re-direct déanta ó na cinn eile. Aon chomhairle agatsa? GRMA! --Antóin 21:18, 11 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)

Caithfidh tú an leathanach athsheolaidh Óglaigh na hÉireann a scriosadh agus ansin is féidir an athainmniú a dhéanamh. --Footyfanatic3000 21:35, 11 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)
Ceart agat, a chara, dealraítear go bhfuil sé chomh simplí sin. GRMA! --Antóin 10:49, 12 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)
Haha GRMA :) --Footyfanatic3000 00:12, 13 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)

The 10,000th article

Is there any way to make sure that the article about Ivan Bunin will in fact be the 10,000th article? Thanks, Footyfanatic3000 01:39, 15 Feabhra 2010 (UTC).

  • We can all watch really closely & move it into mainspace just as the article count clocks over - Alison 08:10, 15 Feabhra 2010 (UTC)

en:National Monument (Ireland)

Idk if you've been watching over on the EN side of the world, but I've finished listing out the National Monuments of Ireland. I commented on the talk page there, so if you'd like to respond, your thoughts would be appreciated. I probably won't look at this GA watchlist, so if you'd like to respond to me directly, you can do so at my EN talk page. Thanks! --Dudemanfellabra 17:07, 1 Márta 2010 (UTC)

Tanansp

Just to let you know this user, Tanansp, who has created a lot of Google Translate articles has been doing this on many other wikis, as you can see from this user's SUL. He/she has been warned on the other wikis, and is now even blocked for three months on the Welsh wiki.

Maybe we should warn this user here? This editor, unlike most others doesn't seem to have good intentions... --Footyfanatic3000 23:23, 17 Márta 2010 (UTC)

Thug Antóin rabhadh dó inné. Guliolopez 00:07, 18 Márta 2010 (UTC)

Teimpléad:Bratach

Hi Guliolopez. I was wondering if you could take a look at http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Bandiera at some stage and see if it's possible to use it in improving the Bratach template on here. That Italian template seems to successfully get around the problem you cited on the Bratach page regarding the labelling convention on WM-Commons.

It uses the same images but allows for names to be entered in Italian, pops up country names in Italian when you move your mouse over the image and is capable of producing a country's name in Italian beside its flag by merely specifying |nome. It would be nice to have those facilities on here especially the last one, which is invaluable when creating or using other templates. Go raibh maith agat. Onetonycousins 04:45, 13 Bealtaine 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Monobook.css/Common.js

If yourself or one of the other administrators could update the css and js to enable this template using this image, that would be great. Onetonycousins 14:16, 6 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)


Corn FIFA An Domhain 2010

bhí mé ag ceapadh go mbeidh sé go maith dá mbeadh an alt seo mar an alt roghnaithe ar an príomh leathanach ach níl mo chuid gaeilge maith go leoir do sin ach pé scéal é rinne mé é seo don alt Úsáideoir:Spaircí/Corn FIFA An Domhain 2010‎ céard a cheapann tú? tá an chead leath (babhta na ngrúpaí) réidh ach ní raibh a fhois agam céard é an tslí is fearr leis an dara leath a dhéanamh ó thaobh na teimpléid srl. --Spaircí 10:34, 8 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)

Saol an mhadaidh bháin

First of all I beg your pardon because I don't speak Irish (I wish I could). I'd like to ask you a favor, I'm a member of a Catalan association that wishes to become a Chapter but that has been rejected up to this moment because it doesn't have a state! So if you could translate the following template (add the Irish where there is Catalan or English if you prefer it that way!) I would then work on a campaign to convince your fellow Wikipedians to stick it to their introductory page. Go raibh maith agat! Slán agat! May you have a great and warm summer, Capsot 17:48, 8 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)


I had asked someone else previously but either he didn't have time or didn't see it or didn't care (actually he was the second, the first one obviously didn't care at all...). I hope I am not bothering you (tell me if that should be the case!). May your great culture, language and music live long and enchant us! Capsot 21:48, 13 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)

Well, it seems like everyone is either too busy here or that Irish is way too important a language to take care of minorized languages. Just let me know if you just forgot or if you don't care, please, so I can keep on begging support that other Wikipedias have given me a long time ago. Thanks, even though I seem to get no reply here I sincerely hope all your contributions will help Irish become a stronger language. Have a good night, week and summer, slán agat Capsot 21:19, 17 Meitheamh 2010 (UTC)

féach mo leathanach Eomurchadha

Deisiú

Aon réiteach ar an bhfadhb seo? [1] Go raibh maith agat! Mangaire

Yes check.svgY Déanta [2] Guliolopez 10:49, 2 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Re: Original Research

I notice you have tagged several of my articles with an "original research" tag obviously meaning that this is unacceptable. You might well live in an area where there is nothing that can't be proven by references on the internet, where literally everything has been written about, has been investigated by hundreds or thousands of people. I don't. This area is remote - many things about it are generally unknown, no archaeological investigations have been carried out in Kilcommon - all monies have gone to Seamus Caulfield in the eastern area of North Mayo and in a different parish. My parish in unexplored, under-funded, under-investigated, under-appreciated, exploited and in danger of destruction. A far more suitable site for the Corrib Gas Project (in which you seem to have substantial interest!!??!!) is Belderrig but do you know this - somebody in power in Ireland has a holiday home there, so why do you think this corrupt project is shoved off to the west to a site proving to be utterly unsuitable?? Do you know that Westport is a far more suitable landfall site for the Corrib Gas project? So why isn't it there? Think about it a little!

So, yes, Guliolopez - some of my research is original - but I hope you can learn to appreciate that this makes it all the more interesting, appropriate and better. We have walked the mountains, we have searched the remotest areas, we have lain on wet grass pulling grass and weeds off massive stone megalithic capstones, unknown, unrecorded, unprotected, hidden by the encroaching blanket bog and lay on the ground putting our arms in underneath them and finding orthostats unseen by humans since neolithic times when they were built and we have found hillsides of blanket bog which conceal twenty or more unknown megalithic tombs and God knows what else on their slopes - things that no other human living on earth nowadays knows about.

So, yes, some of what I write here is original research - carried out by local people qualified in archaeology but not the hob-nobs of archaeological society. We work at documenting this on a budget of €NIL €ZERO €00.00 - except blood, sweat and tears while Caulfield directs all archaeological funding into his own pet projects around his holiday home. Talk about CONFLICT OF INTERESTS - you don't know the half of it!!

Caulfield has been told of the court tomb in Faulagh townland with the carvings on it. The manager of the Ceide Fields has been told about it too and they have been asked to come to the area and look. The result - REFUSAL!! Why? Some of their money for their own area might have to be spent in this area if this became public knowledge!!

Bad enough to have to battle corruption everywhere else. The battle with our corrupt society goes right down to ignoring reality if it might downgrade your own pet project and draw attention (and money) away from it - i.e. Ceide Fields!.

I ask you to please allow me to have a little space for original research!! I'm writing the truth and the facts. If you don't like it then that is your problem and you should realise that you don't know everything because Ireland is a corrupt and untruthful place and many in power are deeply corrupted and dishonest! Talk about neutral point of view - you don't know the meaning of the word in relation to the archaeology of north Mayo.

And I seem to recollect that you removed a picture of bottlenose dolphins from the Broadhaven Bay article because the photograph was taken off the Scottish coast, not in Broadhaven Bay. This is so silly of you because it would take less than half an hour for those self same dolphins to be in Broadhaven Bay. Do you think the sea has borders? Dolphins come in regularly to take a look at Shell's destruction of our beautiful bay even now!! I don't have a good camera with zoom lens etc.... the other day there was a pod of about eight dolphins in the bay - one of them was an albino - I was watching them through my bird spotter monocular bought from Aldi - but it doesn't take good pictures I'm afraid!

Maybe you would have time to come to Kilcommon (Kilcommon Lodge Hostel does excellent cheap and cheerful accommodation in Pollathomas) and lie on your belly too and feel the orthostats in unknown megaliths with your arms too, groping around in the dark looking into the secrets lying under the blanket bogs of north Mayo?? I honestly think you need to get to grips with nature a great deal more and be a little less petty about things like dolphins not being in Broadhaven Bay when photographed!! Maybe you would have one of your old cameras to give me with good zoom lens so that I can take those pictures you tell me I should be taking??

Comhar 11:45, 12 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Wow. Thanks for all that. Appreciate you taking the time to explain your thinking and where you're coming from. Just a few quick things:
  • Caulfield: I don't know who this Caulfield person is, or what he's got to do with anything, and I'm not sure it matters. If you don't mind (for BLP reasons) I may "hide" some of the above from my talk page in due course.
  • OR: Yes, its probably true that there are probably more and varied books covering those topics that I'm interested in - and so its easier for me to turn around, grab one off the shelf, and verify or cite a fact. In that way I'm probably a little better equipped to back stuff up. And I appreciate that it may not be as easy for others. However it's worth pointing out that WP:OR (that "all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source") is not my rule. It's Wikipedia's rule.
  • COI: Yes - I do have personal opinions on the Corrib situation. And you may even be surprised by what "camp" I'm in. However neither I (nor anyone else) should put those interests/opinions over those of this project. The project is supposed to remain neutral/factual/etc. So, if you see me tempering commentary or uncited opinion (no matter what "argument" it supports), please take it as an attempt to follow the principles of this project. Not to knock down or build up any side of any argument.
  • Erris: I've been to Erris. Granted it was 15 years ago or more. And I'll be delighted to go back. Havn't taken my 2010 hols yet, and may even take you up on your offer. If I do take the spin I'll ping you for some thoughts on what do do and where to go, etc.
  • AGF/NPA: Finally, and apologies if I did something to offend, but please keep NPA and AGF in mind as you continue on your editting journey.
Le meas. Guliolopez 14:32, 12 Iúil 2010 (UTC)


Bosca Sonraí Comhphobail na Spáinne

Teimpléad:Bosca Sonraí Comhphobail na Spáinne Céard a cheapann tú bhfuil sé maith go leoir...? an rachfaidh méar aighead len é a chuir leis na hailt go léir. --212.129.91.30 17:43, 12 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Bain úsáid as in alt amháin ar dtús. Asturias mar shampla. Guliolopez 18:17, 12 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Griangrafana 360eire

Cén fath an gceapann tú gur spam atá i mo chuid links? Níl aon fógraíocht ar an suíomh agam ar chor ar bith. Curann na griafanna seo go mór leis an eolas atá ann faoi W.B Yeats. Ar aon chaoi ma sin é do thuairm, ní feidir liom faic a dheanamh, nó an feidir? —Scríobh an t-úsáideoir Dialinn (plédréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

Ní féidir. Ar léigh tú na dtreoirlíne anseo: WP:LINKSPAM? Go simplí: "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam". Níl tú ag iarraidh an tionscadal seo a bhfeabhsú. Tá tú ag iarraidh do ghréasán féin a chur chun cinn. That is spamming. That is not allowed. Sin é. Guliolopez 17:22, 15 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Ceart go leor, ach is mór an trua é mar go cailleadh daoine amach ar na radharcanna agus na suíomhanna a spreag an file.

Bhain tú amach na links ar fad a chur mé isteach do Co. an Chlár, caith tú admhail go dtugann na griafanna seo tuiscint níos fearr do daoine a bheadh suim acu san aiteanna atá luaite sa leathnacha wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dialinn (talk • contribs) 20:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Luaigh tú "Níl tú ag iarraidh an tionscadal seo a bhfeabhsú". Iarann tú an ráiteas sin mar is fíric atá ann, is tuarim maslach atá ann, tá mé ag iarradh an tionscadal a fheasú, sin é an fath a chur mé na griafanna 360 sin isteach ar leathnach béal na mblath agus ar co. an chlár.

Cúnamh

Excuse me Guliolopez but could you tell me what the plural of láithreas (appearance) is: láithris, láithreasa, láithreais, rud eile? Dictionaries have nothing. Onetonycousins 22:53, 18 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Sa spóirt? Bhféidir feidhmiúcháin (performance(s)) nó rannpháirtíochta (participation(s))? Cad faoi "cluichí" mar atá in úsáid anseo: Teimpléad:Imreoir CLG bosca eolais? Guliolopez 22:32, 19 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
My preferred choice would be Láithris and a google search indicates that it (láithreas) is/has been used in the context of sports, [3] but if it wasn't suitable then I'd probably go with feidhmiúcháin. Láithris seems to be used in relation to court appearances, which seems apt to me as one could view a sporting contest as a trial. Is there a specific reason why it doesn't sit right? Onetonycousins 00:02, 20 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
It just doesn't sound right somehow. A bit artificial. I just can't hear Mícheál Ó Muircheartaigh saying it. What's the context? Maybe if could see it in context might help. Are you putting it in an infobox? If so, what's wrong with "cluichí" to indicate games they've played in? (FYI That BBC website uses semi-autotranslated plodding Irish. Take the heading on that page: "HEorpaigh tuilleadh súil WGC rath". WTF? Wouldn't take anything on that as reasonable precedent.) Guliolopez 20:25, 20 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

If you fill in the láithris parameter in the infobox on this page with a random name and preview it, you'll see the context. I changed it to appearance record (for the season). I've used "cluichí" on its own in a player infobox where no explanation was needed but this is a team season box and space is at a premium. Is mó cluichí a d'imir (excuse me if that's incorrect) would be a last resort. I understand where you're coming from regarding instances like this but I reckon that necessity plays a part in how languages evolve. If it's grammatically correct then I think it's a small but positive addition to the Irish language. I'm sure Mícheál would agree. Onetonycousins 06:46, 21 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Seandálíocht

An mbeadh sé ceart go leor griangrafana a chur isteach ar leathnacha seandálóchta? —Scríobh an t-úsáideoir Dialinn (plédréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

Gach cás ar a fhiúntas féin! Guliolopez 20:06, 20 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Navboxes

Any chance you could configure Navbox so that it uses the entire page width? Go raibh maith agat. Onetonycousins 04:30, 26 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

You can do it yourself. Just add the following to any navbox template which uses the default navbox format: "|style = width:90%". Or tell me what navbox you want to widen and I can take a look. Guliolopez 18:05, 26 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
It's Teimpléad:Séasúir Shamrock Rovers Football Club. I'd prefer it to stretch from the left margin to the right. Go raibh maith agat. Onetonycousins 09:53, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Cork City U-20 Team

Why have you removed the Cork City U-20 squad? This is similar to a reserve team of a bigger club (for example Arsenal F.C. who have a reserves section. Both Rory Morrisey and Willie Heffernan, who have made appearances in the first team this season, are now in our "reserve" squad and subsequently don't have first team numbers anymore, but won't appear on the webpage now the U-20s squad has been removed. A number of the players who have signed may appear in the first team during the rest of the season also-albeit, this seems unlikely to me. I had added the section-but not pages behind for the majority of players in it, as I feel it is of relevance to Cork City fans, and also it will make it easier to add players as they move from the u-20s team to the first team squad. I wish to request the return of the U-20s section based on these reasons if possible. Kind Regards, --Joseph McSweeney 23:09, 26 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I removed it for several reasons. (Same reasons I noted in the edit summary). The main reasons - in order - were/are:
  1. Per WP:ATH, youth players/reserves typically don't meet the notability criteria (unless on their own merits).
  2. Per WP:VER, no cites were provided for that section.
  3. The intro and content of the section didn't seem accurate. It stated "The following players are eligible for the first team but are in the U-20 squad." And then went on to list the entire youth squad. Are they all eligible? I wouldn't have thought so.
  4. Similarly certain individual member entries seemed suspect. EG: Heffernan has been 21 since the start of the season - and yet is listed as eligible for the U-20 squad(?)
  5. And finally - precedent. You mention that the Arsenal F.C. article mentions Reserve/Youth players. This may be true - but only where they individually meet WP:GNG. You might notice that none (that I can see) of the other LOI articles mention Youth teams - likely because LOI youth squad players typically DON'T meet the GNG.
Anyway, long story short, my reading of the guidelines suggests that the section doesn't belong. Not in the form it was there. And not in any form that I can think of. Hence I removed it. Sin a bhfuil. Guliolopez 23:42, 26 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
Hi
  1. Fair enough on removing the list of players who don't meet the criteria then, no arguments from me. Its a little bullish though maybe to remove the section entirely, why should the two aforementioned players be removed from the site entirely when they've already played this season and made the bench subsequently?
  2. I sadly don't have a reference that is good enough. The squad list was mailed out to FORAS Co-Operative members only, and I added the list as I felt it was relevant to our club-especially those who aren't members of FORAS. Apologies for the lack of a cite.
  3. Well they can all play in the senior team, if our manager chooses to pick them! So technically yes, they are all eligible for the first team. The LOI rulebook is a poorly written thing (hence the numerous number changes this season), and there is nothing stopping players representing in both. Athlone Town have a used a number of players in both competitions this season for example. Even so, I feel its important to list both Rory and Willie on the site as both have played for the senior side this season and are now in our U-20s squad-I would be more than happy for every name to be removed except their names if this is an acceptable compromise?
  4. He was 20 at the turn of the year, therefore is eligible. This is the same in every level in Ireland-from the bottom leagues to the U-23 National team (see Stephen O'Donnell who recently represented Ireland despite now being 24). He only turned 21 on the 19th of April, so he is eligible for the U-20s section this season. We have released several players (Eoin Forde, Wesley Tonge, etc) because they were not eligible for the U-20s and deemed surplus in the senior set-up.
  5. Would the two players who have played senior football this season not be eligible then? I can accept the other names being removed. I included the names but not pages behind as I thought this might be acceptable (to have the information listed simply as a line of text rather than a fairly pointless page for a youth player).
  6. I can accept the lack of precedent but it seems tough to set one if things keep being deleted! :D
I feel that we should at least have an U-20s section containing Willie and Rory at the very least, as it seems shameful not to have both listed on the page. Its relevant information for an encyclopedic site to have I feel! Joseph McSweeney 01:45, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
Creating their own table (just for two players) is inviting issues. If they've played competitively for the first team, then I see no problem including them in the "current squad" table. Perhaps after Piechnik as "unnumbered" extended squad memebers? In the same way that Kerr/Meenan/McMahon show on the Drogs article? Guliolopez 09:59, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
I had a number of players in the current squad section in such a manner for a time (Morrisey, Forde, Dineen, etc), but it looks very untidy I feel, hence why I'd Mcreated a separate section. What issues do you think this would be creating? Conversely I could create a separate page entirely outlining Cork City's Youth team and season if that would be useful? Joseph McSweeney 13:31, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
The problem with a separate section is that it invites expansion. And that leads to non-notable (if good faith) submissions. (Exactly this happened on the CCFC article. It was a list of reserve/youth players who met ATH by playing for the first team. It became a list of all youth players. Notable or not.) I wouldn't recommend creating a separate page as a means of addressing this problem. Not least because - as you note - it can't be supported with refs. Best to just put them in the existing table - "untidy" or not. We already get lots of "noise" (see this for example) from editors who believe that ALL LOI player profiles are worthy of AfD. Start introducing articles on non-pro youth teams into the mix and it will likely attract unwanted attention of the "LOI is not fully-pro, therefore wave the delete brush wildly" variety. And that brush will sweep further than youth teams/players. In short: Keep it within NN and ATH - otherwise risk unwanted attention/debate. Guliolopez 14:52, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough in my book, I remember those arguments at the time. They were very frustrating. I'll just add them at the end of the first team so. Cheers for explaining the reasoning though! Its much appreciated. Thanks, Joseph McSweeney 15:27, 27 Iúil 2010 (UTC)

Mí-eagraíocht:

Tá duine eigin ag ligeann air féin go mise atá ann ar an suíomh seo. An mbeadh tú inann comhairle a chur orm conas an athrú a dhéan sé a athrú ar ais. Sé an usaideoir na Diallin, tá mise ag úsaid dialinn.—Scríobh an t-úsáideoir Dialinn (plédréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

Tá mearbhall orm. Cad atá ar súil? Cad atá uait? Guliolopez 23:27, 10 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Tá mearbhall ormsa fresin, mar go fhuil duine éigin ag athrú mo chuid eagarthoireacht agus ag úsaid an username an chosúil le mo cheannsa. Níl mé ag iarradh do am a chur amú faoi seo, ach ba mhaith liom fáil amach má chuireann mé ina cheart an eagarthoireacht a dhéan Diallin, né bheidh cosc orm aon eagarthoireacht a dheanamh sa todhchaí. Sin é an méid.

Infobox standards

Hi Guliolopez, I edited the template because I thought it looked very poor. At the end of the day, this encyclopedia will stand or fall on the strength and reliability of its content but first you have to draw people to the content. I strongly believe that sharp and structured infoboxes, navboxes, visual aids, etc. can help in this regard. I'd be delighted if the core "infobox" CSS style was updated to something like the edited actor infobox. I know some other wikis use a similar style. I'd also be delighted if the navboxes used the full width of the page and the alternative (smaller) reference list arrows were restored. If you feel that my edits to the actor template should be undone, then fire away. Sláinte. Onetonycousins 08:34, 28 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Can you be more specific about why you think it looks "very poor"? I totally agree that visuals are important - which is in fact why I think we need to be consistent and measured in our application of styles and design artefacts. I appreciate that there is a subjectiveness involved, but personally I think that the simple clean infobox we had (and have for all other bio infoboxes) is fine. You mention that "other wikis use a similar style". However, when I look at the actor infoboxes used by other all other wikis (EG: en, el, cy, cs, bs, es, eu, is, sv, etc) I find that none of them use a style similar to the grey background you have applied to the lefthand "label" section here. Certainly some use a background colour for the subject line, but even then it is tempered and measured in it's use. For these reasons I will (as you suggest) temper some of your changes a bit.
In regards to the point about "navboxes us[ing] the full width of the page", and "reference list arrows [being] restored", can you advise what you're talking about here? Possibly pointing to an example article or navbox? If you can point out any specific issues or bugs, I'd be happy to help address. Beir bua leis. Guliolopez 18:44, 28 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Hi Guliolopez, in my opinion the actor infobox looks very sloppy and half assed. I'm not a big fan of the labels being center aligned. I think they look much better lined up against the left border of the box and increase readability. Even right aligned would be better than center in my opinion. I also think that some form of padding/spacing helps with aesthetics and readability. It gives an infobox a really clear structure. Finally, I often prefer a smaller font (88%) but that's purely a personal preference.

OK. I think I'm following you now. As it happens the labels are actually supposed to be left aligned. And in fact look left aligned on the browsers I have tested with. However just looking at the CSS and style classes used, I see that it may have some bugs/issues in it. I'll take a look at this. (As a matter of interest, what OS/Browser are you using that you are not seeing them left aligned?) Guliolopez 11:53, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

An example of "my kind of infobox": pt:Jennifer Aniston. When I mentioned other wikis using a similar style I was talking about their core CSS style rather than a specific infobox.

While I personally find the PT style infobox a bit busy, and the use of colour a little overdone, there may be a compromise between that style and the one used here and on EN wiki. Whatever we do however it should be consistent with other bio infoboxes. Hence I think we should be looking at creating/updating the base infobox/vcard styles, and not hardcoding HTML in individual infoboxes. Guliolopez 11:53, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the arrows in the reflists, if you have a look at the reflist in pt:Jennifer Aniston and then its english language equivalent, you'll notice two different styles of arrow beside the numbering in the lists. I think the one in use on the english language wiki looks better and Alison kindly changed it at my request before. It has since changed back (since the recent update). It's only a small thing so whatever you want.

I think I'm following this. I'll take a look. Guliolopez 11:53, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

On the navboxes, I prefer this to this.

OK. I'll take a look at the default width style used by the NAVBOX class and see what can be done. In the meantime you can force the width with a style parameter similar to the below. Cheers Guliolopez 11:53, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)
{{Navbox
|basestyle = background:#008000;color:#FFFFFF;
|style = width:100%;
|title = Séasúir Shamrock Rovers Football Club
|name = Séasúir Shamrock Rovers Football Club
|list1 = TEXT
}}

Go raibh maith agat. Onetonycousins 08:43, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your time and help Guliolopez, much appreciated. I'm using Internet Explorer 8 and have had the odd minor issue with display on Wikipedia in the past. Onetonycousins 12:33, 29 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Selena

Hey thanks for helping out on this article! AJona1992 02:30, 9 Deireadh Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Hajduk Split

Hi Guliolopez, I see you moved Hrvatski nogometni klub Hajduk Split to an abbreviated name, citing the english language wikipedia's COMMONNAME convention. I've two issues with this. One, I am not aware of such a rule on Vicipéid or how severely it should be applied. Two, HNK Hajduk Split isn't a common name anyway, it's an abbreviated name. Hajduk Split would be a common name but if we were to title pages like that then we would have pages like Man United and Inter Milan, presuming that those are indeed common names as Gaeilge. I agree with abbreviating titles where the title is too long but I don't think that applies here. Sláinte. Onetonycousins 20:22, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Hi. (1) We do apply a COMMONNAME convention here. It's not enshrined, but we do follow/apply one. (2) Just about every other Wiki (including the local project) uses "HNK Hajduk Split" rather than the long form. (3) I'm not sure "Man Utd" or "Inter" are valid corollaries. While those abbreviations are in common use "verbally", the relevant clubs and leagues don't typically refer to themselves as "Man Utd" or "Inter". On the other hand, the club itself, the relevant league, and UEFA all use short forms of "HNK Hajduk Split". In summary, it's probably better to use the most common officially sanctioned form - over long/verbose/overly formal names. Guliolopez 22:42, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Hi Guliolopez, thanks for the reply. While I disagree with most of your reply, citing Club Atlético de Madrid, the local project, its website and UEFA, I take it that you think "Hrvatski nogometni klub Hajduk Split" is too long and/or overly formal so I'll reluctantly go along with "HNK Hajduk Split", just like so many wikis go along with the english language wiki's problematic policy of abbreviation. Sláinte. Onetonycousins 23:14, 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2010 (UTC)

Fóineolaíocht na Gaeilge

A chara, níor gha an nasc fein faoi fhóineolaíocht na Gaeilge a bhaint, anois ní rithfidh sé le duine an t-alt a scríobh. nach féidir díreach an t-ábhar air a scrios? ~~ —Scríobh an t-úsáideoir 193.1.172.163 (plédréachtaí) an trácht roimhe seo, ach bhí síniú in easnamh.

Haigh. B'fhéidir go raibh mé ró-thapa, ach bhí ceisteanna bailí ag eagarthóir eile faoi "DB-G1". ("Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text [are eligible for speedy deletion]"). Athchóireoidh mé go "sandbox" ar do leathanach féin, ach ba chóir é a feabhsú sular é a athchóireofar go hiomlán... Guliolopez 16:38, 3 Mí na Samhna 2010 (UTC)


Gan gá le neamhord?

A dhuine tá neamhord fíoréagsúil ó ghalar go cinnte. Ná déantar iad a chumascadh. Táim ag cur le cúrsaí an leighis i láthair na huaire agus ní theastaíonn seo chor ar bith. Fiú ó thaobh téármaíochta tá bearna ollmhór céille idir neamhord agus galar. 19:02, 7 Mí na Samhna 2010 (UTC)

Ceart go leor. Ach ba chóir go mbeadh an réasúnaíocht/difríocht soiléir sna hailt féin... Guliolopez 14:58, 8 Mí na Samhna 2010 (UTC)

Maorlathach

Tá náire orm mar gheall ar an mhoill! Tá cearta maoirseachta agat (agus ag Alison) anois. --Gabriel Beecham 02:42, 17 Mí na Nollag 2010 (UTC)

  • Chomhgáirdeas leat! :) - Alison 05:20, 17 Mí na Nollag 2010 (UTC)
GRMA! Guliolopez 11:51, 17 Mí na Nollag 2010 (UTC)

Maigh Chromtha

Ní mise a chuir an abairt úd leis ar an gcéad dul síos, ach bhraitheas go raibh síol an eolais ann, is chuireas beagán leis ionas nach n-imeoidh an duine a chur ann é ón suíomh ag ceapadh nach bhfuil a c(h)uid cabhrach ag teastail, b'fhearr díreach cur ar súile an duine sin an tabhacht a bhaineann le heolas cruinn, beacht srl, srl. Nílim ag iarraidh cur as duit ach díreach bí fáilteach roimh ionchur dhaoine, ba léir iarracht mhacánta an úsáideora ann. Eomurchadha 01:35, 15 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Grand. GRMA. Guliolopez 14:46, 15 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Greetings from Italy

Hello Guliolopez. Can you help us to translate and upload on ga.wikipedia this page ? It is very important for us.:)). Thanks a lot--Aeron10 18:27, 20 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your interest in the GA project. Unfortunately as a general rule I (personally) don't like to act on requests such as yours - as it feels a little like spam/canvassing, raises notability questions, and can easily result in out-of-date content. (If a topic is notable to the Irish speaking community, then an article will be created "organically" in due course, and will be kept up to date. "Artificially" created/translated articles can suffer from limited research, be of limited interest to the community, and quickly get out of date as no-one's invested enough to maintain them.) This obviously isn't a project guideline, and someone else may be happy to create the article for you, but personally I think it's best to focus energies on creating/maintaining articles which are of "organic" interest to the community. Ciao/grazie. Guliolopez 00:48, 23 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Bosca Aimsire

Dia dhuit! You'll have to forgive me for resorting to English, but I'm quite tired after a few hours of editing! You may have noticed I've created a 'weather box' to plot city climates, as is common on the English language Wikipedia - the few we have here are custom made and are much less attractive than the proper table. The only city I've edited for far is Melbourne - in any case, our Vicipéid is now one of the very few Wikis to have a decent version of the climate box. My question is whether you think there should be space for measurements in Fahrenheit, or whether Celsius is adequate for now? I'm happy either way. :) GRMA. Rob Lindsey 00:17, 23 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Personally I think Celsius looks fine on its own. (Fahrenheit not really used here anymore, and probably a bit of work trying to add it without mucking up the template. Suggest it's not worth the time investment). One thought however: On the article for Melbourne (and Geelong), the climate box width is 80%. My screen is pretty big, but even at 80%, the climate box wraps below the infoboxes. Suggest reducing default to ~70%. Guliolopez 00:48, 23 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)
Done and done. :) Rob Lindsey 00:56, 23 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

Íomhánna

Maidin mhaith, Guliolopez! Tuigim go bhfuil fadhbanna leis na íomhánna seo – I’m well aware of the locations of all my uploaded pictures, and will endeavour to fix them in the next few hours if possible. Tá brón orm. Rob Lindsey 22:35, 30 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)

User Page

Hi, Guliolopez. I don´t know irish (and my english is basic), so I would like to know, if you could translate these three sentences in english to irish, because I would like to use in my user page a basque / irish personal presentation:
1. Hi, my name is Euskalduna and I´m from Basque Country. This is my user page. Greeting.
2. My images
3. Here you have a sample of my more recent photos

Thanks. - Euskalduna 23:55, 10 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svgY Déanta Guliolopez 20:30, 12 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Could you help me to translate the english text of my pictures in my user page to irish? Example: My user page in the Welsh Wikipedia Eskerrik asko / Go raibh maith agat. - Euskalduna 11:13, 13 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Please, could you translate en:Podolsk into Gaeilge? Naturally if you have available time!

Good day to you! Could you, please, translate into Gaeilge the article, containing two-three sentences, about this city in Russia? I’d like to thank you in advance :)--Переход Артур 13:28, 13 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Ar an lá seo

LOL sausage fests!! :D Yeah, I've been trying to balance them since we've started out with this scheme & it's not easy. However - Sarah fucking Palin!! :D There - it's gone out of my system now - LOL!! - Alison 21:33, 13 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Death anomalies

Haigh, a Ghulio. Dunno if you've seen Vicipéid:Bunachar sonraí tuarascálacha/Daoine atá beo ar an vicí seo ach marbh ar vicíonna eile yet, but I've asked User:Merlissimo to have his bot generate this list. Basically, it catalogues biographies on here where subjects are marked as living (undead!) where they have death dates on other wikis, mostly enwiki, dewiki, frwiki. I'll pick through these in my 'spare time' and update the [[Catagóir:Básanna i ...]] etc, accordingly. Slán arís - Alison 08:36, 15 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Haigh. Chonaic mé é - cinnte. An-suimiúil. I looked at it last week, and may have addressed one or two already. I'll definitely jump in where I can. (I think a lot are due to "redlinked" DOD categories, so should be relatively easy to fix). Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 10:05, 15 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)
Sin é - most of them are redlinked cats. Féach anseo. Can you also check AllieBot's latest - it's running a standardized markup cleaner script and is hitting redir'd cats, extra spaces, bad markup, page formatting, etc. It's doing a nice job, IMO, on our localization here and I ran it full-tilt tonight over about 50 articles & it made short work of them. What would you think if I blitzed the entire of article space in batches of, say, 500 articles at a time? It's a bot, so recent changes won't get bunged, and it's really being clean! Thoughts?? - Alison 10:15, 15 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)
Hey. That filtered "redlinked cats" link is handy - GRMA. On the clean-up bot, I'd say trial it with another block of 50 or 100 before going full guns. (It's been well behaved so far, but there's always a risk with these things...) Guliolopez 11:42, 15 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)
Quick update: I ran it again during 'off-time' on the wiki here tonight. There's nobody on to see the bot fill up RecentChanges (with 'Taispeáin róbónna' on). I ran it in batches of 50 or so, then checked every diff by hand. In total, the bot processed a good few hundred pages, flawlessly, IMO. Here are some choice diffs I picked out so you can see a variety of the work being done; unescaping, de-underscoring wikilinks, replacing old category names, doing a nice job of splitting words such as [[Éire|Éireannach]] -> [[Éire]]annach, etc, forcing blankspace in scientific / math text. In this case, temperatures, kicking over to valid XHTML, de-cluttering, sorting and CAPSing categories, unicode handling / unescaping, fixing ISBNs. And so on ... What do you think so far? It seems to be doing a good job so far. I'm not going to run it full-on or anything & go off and make tea or anything. It'll be small batches, supervised, for a while ... - Alison 07:07, 16 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)
And I took some sorta notion to run off all the Básanna i .... categories and fix all the misnamed ones. Daoine a rugadh ... some other time. I must be mad! :) - Alison
Bot looks "well-behaved" all right, so I concur: should be fine to go ahead and start letting it loose on bigger batches of articles. Guliolopez 10:05, 16 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)
Ok - did about 750+ articles tonight, in large batches. We've cleared all the numeric articles and all the "A"s and everything looks great. It particularly neatened up the digit-years :) Onwards to "B" ... and rather than regale you with 20-something daily updates, I'll just have at 'em :) GRMMA arís! - Alison 09:04, 17 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

I started another, large run tonight and basically cleared everything. It's done. I've gone over a lot of them and checked the bot output and everything is just fine. It did a good job on MOS fixes, etc. Either way - done and sorted! It won't really need to be run again for some time, and never to the extent of the number of articles edited. We're pretty clean overall now. Also, this trend looks great :) Thanks for working on that one, too! - Alison 11:49, 23 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)

Translation of my user page

Kaixo, Guliolopez! Zer moduz? Itzuli al zenezake nire lankide orria ingelesetik irlanderara? Irlandar Wikipedian irlandera eta euskarazko lankide orri elebiduna izatea nahiko nuke. Eskerrik asko. Agur!

Dia dhuit, Guliolopez! Conas atá tú? Could you translate my user page from english to gaeilge? I would like to have in Irish Wikipedia a bilingual user page in gaeilge and euskara. Go raibh maith agat. Slán agat !

Euskalduna 7 An Márta 2011 15:58 (UTC)

I thought I did already? To be honest I don't really have the time to re-translate it everytime you make a change. Sorry. Guliolopez 18:13, 7 Márta 2011 (UTC)
To be honest...
You have no time to re-translate "everytime" I make a change (if "everytime" is only the second time) or do not want? - Euskalduna - 19:42, 7 Márta 2011 (UTC)
O.K. Thanks for nothing and for to be a disagreeable person... cheerio :D. - Euskalduna - 18:20, 10 Márta 2011 (UTC)

Maidir leis an leathanach "Contae Aontroma"

'Sé do bheatha a Ghuliolopez, ar thiocfadh leatsa spléachadh a thabhairt ar an leathanach "Contae Aontroma" nuair a bheas an t-am agat? Dar liom féin go dteastaíonn "clean-up tag" uaidh, 'siocair nach bhfuil oiread is tagairt amháin ann is go bhfuil caighdeán measartha íseal i gceist leis i gcoitinne. Go raibh míle maith agat Ancatmara

Maidir le Tagairtí

Haigh a Ghuliolopez, tá mé ag cur na ceiste seo ortsa, os rud é gur tusa an créatúr bocht a dhéanann's bunús na gceartúchán ar leagan amach na dtagairtí ar mo chuid alt! Cha dtuigim caidé mar a dhéantar tagairt amháin a thaispeáint nuair a bhaineann tú úsáid as níos mó ná uair amhain. 'Sé sin, "double references". Tá treorú ann ag barr na leathanaigh, agus déanaimse iarracht i ndiaidh iarrachta é a dhéanamh i gceart, ach cha dtuigim an treorú, le bheith ionraic. Ar mhiste leat cuidiú liom? Go raibh míle maith agat--Ancatmara 14:30, 19 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC)

Mar seo. Guliolopez 19:37, 19 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC)
Iúiríce! Ard-fhear, a ghuliolopez, go raibh míle. --Ancatmara 19:52, 19 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC)

Overlay Maps

Chonaic mé na athruithe ar léirscáileanna Goulburn agus Dubbo díreach anois. Ní raibh a fhios agam go bhfuil an ‘overlay’ ar fáil - beidh rúdaí i bhfad níos éasca domsa anois! Athróidh mé altanna eile leis an fhadhb céanna, chomh luath is féidir. GRMA! Rob Lindsey 02:40, 11 Meitheamh 2011 (UTC)

Tá fáilte romhat. I ndáiríre ní raibh an "overlay" ar fáil roimh ré. Cheap mé go raibh "overlay" (sa template seo) ar iarraidh le tamall anuas, ach níor chuir mé le chéile é ionas gur chonaic mé go bhfuil fadhbanna ag daoine eile freisin... Guliolopez 15:40, 11 Meitheamh 2011 (UTC)

Article requests

Hey Gulio! Where do I put article requests?

I found some articles on EN that need Gaelic versions:

Thanks, WhisperToMe 19:17, 28 Meitheamh 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Article requests go here. Thanks. Guliolopez 10:18, 29 Meitheamh 2011 (UTC)
You are welcome! I posted three article requests WhisperToMe 06:00, 2 Iúil 2011 (UTC)

Hidetoshi Nakata

A chara,

Bheinn sásta cruth a chur ar an alt seo thuas dá mbeadh fáil air fós? Más spéis leat ailt a bhfuil aon chumas iontu in aon chor, bheinn buíoch asat iad a chur chugam féachaint an bhféadfainn iad a shábháil. Má dhéanann duine iarracht alt a chur i dtoll a chéile, dá dhonacht é, ba chóir tacú leo, ach go háirithe de bharr gur cuid den obair bunú an leathanaigh agus a leithéid. Lean leis an de-obair , molaim thú.

Eomurchadha 23:05, 26 Meán Fómhair 2011 (UTC)

Ceart go leor. Tá an alt seo díscriosta anois. Guliolopez 08:55, 27 Meán Fómhair 2011 (UTC)

maith agat- EÓM

Íomhánna

Go raibh maith agat, mar is gnách! So…an bhfuil an ceadúnas sin déanta anois (nó an bhfuil sonraí ar bith in easnamh agam)? Teastaíonn íomhánna cosúla a chuir suas ar an Vicípéid uaim, agus ba mhaith liom a bheith cinnte faoi roimh ré. Rob Lindsey 22:49, 28 Meán Fómhair 2011 (UTC)

An Iodáil

Haigh,

tá mé ag iarraidh roinnt glanadh suas/ord agus eagar a chur ar na hailt faoin Iodáil. Faoi láthair tá an teimpléad seo againn i gcomhair cathacha na hIodáile; http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teimpl%C3%A9ad:Cathracha_na_hIod%C3%A1ile ach tá deich gcathracha in easnamh mar shampla http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trionta , feach http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catag%C3%B3ir:Cathracha_na_hIod%C3%A1ile

D'fhéadfainn iad a chuir isteach sa teimpléad thuas ach ní thugann sé mórán deis dúinn gach cathair na hIodáile a bheith i dteimpléad amháin. An smaoineamh atá agam ná ceann mar ata acu anseo http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Capoluoghi_di_provincia_italiani a chuireann in iúil duit cén réigiún lena baineann an chathair agus cén ceann atá mar phríomhchathair na réigiúin srl. An fhadhb ná go bhfuil orm Navbox generic subgroup (agus is cosúil navbox generic) a chruthú chomh maith... http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Navbox_generic_subgroup Níl mórán eolas agam faoin gcuid seo den vicí agus níl mé ag iarraidh tuille fadhbanna a chruthú. Bhfuil aon comhairle agat dom? Spaircí 15:53, 11 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)23:09, 6 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)

Haigh. Níl aon comhairle agam duit :( Leithscéal lag atá ann, ach - a oiread agus ba mhaith liom iad go léir (na teimpléid seo) a deisiú/ordú - níl an am agam :\ Muna téann tú ar aghaidh, thabharfainn cabhair duit - ach níl aon clue agam céard a thionscnóinn. Guliolopez 23:47, 12 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)

ceist

A chara, níro thuigeas sin faoi gan nasc a chur le mionteideal, grma. Feicim gur scrios tú teimpléad a bhí curtha agam le halt, sin togh ach conas go gcruthóinn teimpléad? grma

Eomurchadha 23:22, 12 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)

Haigh. RE: "main" - Ná bac (táimid go léir ag foghlaim). RE: "elections template" - Féach anseo (ach níl sé éasca :p) Guliolopez 23:50, 12 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)

Prvoslav Vujčić

Hello!

Sorry for writing to you in English but I'm still a layman when it comes to Gaelic hehe. I've put a request for the article of Prvoslav Vujčić to be expanded at Vicipéid:Ailt iarrtha. I don't know however if that page is active. Please do not delete the article as the author is notable. Do you know where I could get help for a translation from Vujčić\s English Wikipedia page? It's also pretty short.

Thanks!

Claddagh 04:47, 13 Mí na Samhna 2011 (UTC)